Difference between revisions of "About PsyCrit"
m (better alignment) |
(mission -> rationale; moved down below) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{| | {| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 11: | Line 9: | ||
[[Will you take ‘neuro’ with that?]] Neuroeconomics is an interesting idea that has an epistemological worm at its core… but there is no guarantee at all that the optimizing process corresponds to “explicit optimization” in which courses of action are well-defined... ''Staddon'' | [[Will you take ‘neuro’ with that?]] Neuroeconomics is an interesting idea that has an epistemological worm at its core… but there is no guarantee at all that the optimizing process corresponds to “explicit optimization” in which courses of action are well-defined... ''Staddon'' | ||
|} | |} | ||
==Site Documents== | |||
* The [[PsyCrit:rationale|rationale]] for PsyCrit | |||
Revision as of 19:33, 16 July 2006
Behavioral EconomicsBehavior-centric versus reinforcer-centric descriptions of behavior. The paper is a brilliant tour-de-force, but a subtext to the paper is what I will call the behavior-centric view. In this view, stimuli are remembered until a response is emitted, and reinforcers reach back in time to effect this response in the presence of the remembered stimulus... Davison |
NeuroeconomicsWill you take ‘neuro’ with that? Neuroeconomics is an interesting idea that has an epistemological worm at its core… but there is no guarantee at all that the optimizing process corresponds to “explicit optimization” in which courses of action are well-defined... Staddon |
Site Documents
- The rationale for PsyCrit