Information for "Are Emotions Natural Kinds"

Basic information

Display titleAre Emotions Natural Kinds
Default sort keyAre Emotions Natural Kinds
Page length (in bytes)1,133
Page ID1472
Page content languageen - English
Page content modelwikitext
Indexing by robotsAllowed
Number of redirects to this page0
Counted as a content pageYes
Number of subpages of this page0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects)

Page protection

EditAllow all users (infinite)
MoveAllow all users (infinite)
View the protection log for this page.

Edit history

Page creatorWikiSysop (talk | contribs)
Date of page creation15:28, 13 April 2007
Latest editorWikiSysop (talk | contribs)
Date of latest edit16:49, 25 July 2020
Total number of edits22
Total number of distinct authors1
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days)0
Recent number of distinct authors0

Page properties

Transcluded templates (2)

Templates used on this page:

Laypeople and scientists alike believe thaLaypeople and scientists alike believe that they know anger, or sadness, or fear, when they see it. These emotions and a few others are presumed to have specific causal mechanisms in the brain and properties that are observable (on the face, in the voice, in the body, or in experience) – that is, they are assumed to be natural kinds. If a given emotion is a natural kind and can be identified objectively, then it is possible to make discoveries about emotion. Indeed, the scientific study of emotion is founded on this assumption. In this article, I review the accumulating empirical evidence that is inconsistent with the view that there are kinds of emotion with boundaries that are carved in nature. I then consider what moving beyond a natural-kind view might mean for the scientific understanding of emotion.r the scientific understanding of emotion. +
Barrett 2006 +
Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 28-58 +
2006-Barrett +
Are Emotions Natural Kinds? +
2006 +