Difference between revisions of "Articles"
(new article; some layout tweaks) |
m (→Commentaries: and reports) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
{{:Target Articles}} | {{:Target Articles}} | ||
| valign=top width=70% | | | valign=top width=70% | | ||
==Commentaries== | ==Commentaries and Reports== | ||
{| | {| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| valign=top width=50% | | | valign=top width=50% | | ||
===LANGUAGE PROCESSING=== | ===LANGUAGE PROCESSING=== | ||
{{faint|2006-09- | {{faint|2006-09-07}} Report: '''Visual Language Processing and Additive Effects of Multiple Factors on Timed Performance: A Challenge for the Interactive Activation Framework?''' Two factors often have additive effects on timed performance in language tasks. Despite 25 years of work, fans of the dominant theoretical framework for language processing have yet to publicly address even a single instance of such additivity... {{:Formats:Besner 2006-09-08}} | ||
===Neuroeconomics=== | ===Neuroeconomics=== | ||
{{faint|2006-07-16}} '''Will you take ‘neuro’ with that?''' Neuroeconomics is an interesting idea that has an epistemological worm at its core… but there is no guarantee at all that the optimizing process corresponds to “explicit optimization” in which courses of action are well-defined... {{:Formats:Staddon 2006-06-28}} | {{faint|2006-07-16}} '''Will you take ‘neuro’ with that?''' Neuroeconomics is an interesting idea that has an epistemological worm at its core… but there is no guarantee at all that the optimizing process corresponds to “explicit optimization” in which courses of action are well-defined... {{:Formats:Staddon 2006-06-28}} | ||
|} | |} | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 01:22, 13 September 2006
Target Articles |
Commentaries and Reports
|