Difference between revisions of "Articles"
(→Commentaries and Reports: 2006-10-27 submission: summary) |
m (→Commentaries and Reports: format tweaks, fixed one or two missing target links) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| valign=top width=50% | | | valign=top width=50% | | ||
===SOCIAL SCIENCE=== | ===SOCIAL SCIENCE=== | ||
{{faint|2006-10-27}} '''Ill-defined'''. What is happening to political science when leading thinkers can pretend to advance knowledge by little more than re-defining words? | {{faint|2006-10-27}} '''Ill-defined'''. ''What is happening to political science when leading thinkers can pretend to advance knowledge by little more than re-defining words? In their article ''[[Anti-Americanisms]]'', an abstract of a forthcoming book, Katzenstein and Keohane begin thus...'' Bertrand: {{:Formats:Bertrand 2006-10-27}} | ||
In their article ''[[Anti-Americanisms]]'', an abstract of a forthcoming book, Katzenstein and Keohane begin thus... {{:Formats:Bertrand 2006-10-27}} | |||
===EMOTION=== | ===EMOTION=== | ||
{{faint|2006-09-23}} '''Emotion is Natural but Categories are Not'''. [[Are Emotions Natural Kinds?|Barrett (2006)]] argues against the construct of emotion by conflating the basic-emotions perspective in neural physiology with a type of category discussed in reference philosophy... {{:Formats:Alvarado 2006-09-23}} | {{faint|2006-09-23}} '''Emotion is Natural but Categories are Not'''. ''[[Are Emotions Natural Kinds?|Barrett (2006)]] argues against the construct of emotion by conflating the basic-emotions perspective in neural physiology with a type of category discussed in reference philosophy...'' Alvarado: {{:Formats:Alvarado 2006-09-23}} | ||
===BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS=== | ===BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS=== | ||
{{faint|2006-07-16}} '''Behavior-centric versus reinforcer-centric descriptions of behavior'''. | {{faint|2006-07-16}} '''Behavior-centric versus reinforcer-centric descriptions of behavior'''. ''[[Notes on discounting|The paper]] is a brilliant tour-de-force, but a subtext to the paper is what I will call the behavior-centric view. In this view, stimuli are remembered until a response is emitted, and reinforcers reach back in time to effect this response in the presence of the remembered stimulus...'' Davison: {{:Formats:Davison 2006-07-09}} | ||
| | | | ||
| valign=top width=50% | | | valign=top width=50% | | ||
===LANGUAGE PROCESSING=== | ===LANGUAGE PROCESSING=== | ||
{{faint|2006-09-07}} Report: '''Visual Language Processing and Additive Effects of Multiple Factors on Timed Performance: A Challenge for the Interactive Activation Framework?''' Two factors often have additive effects on timed performance in language tasks. Despite 25 years of work, fans of the dominant theoretical framework for language processing have yet to publicly address even a single instance of such additivity... {{:Formats:Besner 2006-09-08}} | {{faint|2006-09-07}} Report: '''Visual Language Processing and Additive Effects of Multiple Factors on Timed Performance: A Challenge for the Interactive Activation Framework?''' ''Two factors often have additive effects on timed performance in language tasks. Despite 25 years of work, fans of the dominant theoretical framework for language processing have yet to publicly address even a single instance of such additivity...'' Besner: {{:Formats:Besner 2006-09-08}}'' | ||
===NEUROECONOMICS=== | ===NEUROECONOMICS=== | ||
{{faint|2006-07-16}} '''Will you take ‘neuro’ with that?''' Neuroeconomics is an interesting idea that has an epistemological worm at its | {{faint|2006-07-16}} '''Will you take ‘neuro’ with that?''' ''Neuroeconomics is an interesting idea that has an epistemological worm at its core... but there is no guarantee at all that the optimizing process corresponds to “explicit optimization” in which courses of action are well-defined...'' Staddon: {{:Formats:Staddon 2006-06-28}}'' | ||
|} | |} | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 21:50, 27 October 2006
Target Articles |
Commentaries and Reports
|