Difference between revisions of "Emotion is Natural but Categories are Not"

From PsyCrit
Jump to: navigation, search
(mostly converted to v3)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
<hide>
 
<hide>
[[category:needs tweaking]] - no downloads showing yet
 
 
 
[[responds to::2006-Barrett]]
 
[[responds to::2006-Barrett]]
 
[[keyname::2006-09-20-Alvarado]]
 
[[keyname::2006-09-20-Alvarado]]
Line 11: Line 9:
 
[[listing section::emotion]]
 
[[listing section::emotion]]
  
<call smw.let.var key=lead-in>Barrett argues against the construct of emotion by conflating the basic-emotions perspective in neural physiology with a type of category discussed in reference philosophy...</call>
+
[[lead-in::Barrett argues against the construct of emotion by conflating the basic-emotions perspective in neural physiology with a type of category discussed in reference philosophy...]]
</hide><exec mod=psycrit func=Show_Response_Header />
+
</hide>{{page/spec/response}}

Latest revision as of 16:52, 25 July 2020


  • Title: Emotion is Natural but Categories are Not
  • Author(s): Nancy Alvarado
  • Date: 20 September 2006
  • Keyname: 2006-09-20-Alvarado
  • Responds to: Are Emotions Natural Kinds
  • Lead-in: Barrett argues against the construct of emotion by conflating the basic-emotions perspective in neural physiology with a type of category discussed in reference philosophy...

no responses found

2006-09-20-Alvarado +
Barrett argues against the construct of emotion by conflating the basic-emotions perspective in neural physiology with a type of category discussed in reference philosophy... +
Emotion is Natural but Categories are Not +
Date"Date" is a type and predefined property provided by Semantic MediaWiki to represent date values.
September 20, 2006 +
Personal tools
Contents