Difference between revisions of "Paley Redivivus"
(cite/author; minor reorg; removed "needs tweaking") |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
[[listing section::evolution]] | [[listing section::evolution]] | ||
[[lead-in::Fodor once more presents us with a persuasive, entertaining – and profoundly wrong – view of a great man. Not B. F. Skinner this time, but a much grander figure, none other than Charles Darwin. Fodor's often misdirected attacks on an extinct behaviorism.]] | |||
</hide> | </hide>{{page/spec/response}} | ||
Revision as of 17:23, 25 July 2020
- Title: Paley Redivivus
- Author(s): J. E. R. Staddon
- Date: 28 December 2007
- Keyname: 2007-12-28-Staddon
- Responds to: Why Pigs Don't Have Wings
- Lead-in: Fodor once more presents us with a persuasive, entertaining – and profoundly wrong – view of a great man. Not B. F. Skinner this time, but a much grander figure, none other than Charles Darwin. Fodor's often misdirected attacks on an extinct behaviorism.
Responses
| Date"Date" is a type and predefined property provided by Semantic MediaWiki to represent date values. | Author | Lead-in | |
|---|---|---|---|
| A dialogue between Fodor and Staddon | 12 February 2008 | J. E. R. Staddon Jerry Fodor | Jerry Fodor responded to John Staddon’s comment, and a dialogue ensued. The focal point seems to be whether natural selection should (Fodor), or potentially does (Staddon) provide a causal account of evolutionary adaptation. |
... more about "Paley Redivivus"
Staddon 2007 +
Fodor once more presents us with a persuas … Fodor once more presents us with a persuasive, entertaining – and profoundly wrong – view of a great man. Not B. F. Skinner this time, but a much grander figure, none other than Charles Darwin. Fodor's often misdirected attacks on an extinct behaviorism.irected attacks on an extinct behaviorism. +
Date"Date" is a type and predefined property provided by Semantic MediaWiki to represent date values.
December 28, 2007 +