View source for Physiology may not be (political) destiny

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.

You can view and copy the source of this page.

Template used on this page:

Return to Physiology may not be (political) destiny.

Retrieved from "https://psycrit.com/w/Physiology_may_not_be_(political)_destiny"
... more about "Physiology may not be (political) destiny"
RDF feed
Author
Evan Charney +
Author/affil
Duke University +
Author/ref
Charney +
Keyname
2009-02-23-Charney +
Lead-in
Oxley et al. (2008) translate an eyeblink … Oxley et al. (2008) translate an eyeblink and a slight sweat, provoked by different kinds of pictures, into a political position. Science magazine apparently raised no objections. Charney points out that both eye blinks and GSR changes can be interpreted in very many ways. Oxley et al.’s grand conclusions leave their modest data well behind.sions leave their modest data well behind. +
Listing section
Neuropolitics +
Page type
Spec/response +
Responds to
2008-Oxley +
Title
Physiology may not be (political) destiny +
Date"Date" is a type and predefined property provided by Semantic MediaWiki to represent date values.
February 23, 2009 +