Information for "Stochastic matching and the voluntary nature of choice"

From PsyCrit
Jump to: navigation, search

Basic information

Display titleStochastic matching and the voluntary nature of choice
Default sort keyStochastic matching and the voluntary nature of choice
Page length (in bytes)1,616
Page ID1506
Page content languageen - English
Page content modelwikitext
Indexing by robotsAllowed
Number of redirects to this page0
Counted as a content pageYes
Number of subpages of this page0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects)

Page protection

EditAllow all users (infinite)
MoveAllow all users (infinite)
View the protection log for this page.

Edit history

Page creatorWikiSysop (talk | contribs)
Date of page creation15:58, 11 October 2007
Latest editorWikiSysop (talk | contribs)
Date of latest edit17:26, 25 July 2020
Total number of edits7
Total number of distinct authors1
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days)0
Recent number of distinct authors0

Page properties

Transcluded templates (2)

Templates used on this page:

Attempts to characterize voluntary behavioAttempts to characterize voluntary behavior have been ongoing for thousands of years. We provide experimental evidence that judgments of volition are based upon distributions of responses in relation to obtained rewards. Participants watched as responses, said to be made by "actors," appeared on a computer screen. The participant's task was to estimate how well each actor represented the voluntary choices emitted by a real person. In actuality, all actors' responses were generated by algorithms based on Baum’s (1979) generalized matching function. We systematically varied the exponent values (sensitivity parameter) of these algorithms: some actors matched response proportions to received reinforcer proportions, others overmatched (predominantly chose the highest-valued alternative), and yet others undermatched (chose relatively equally among the alternatives). In each of five experiments, we found that the matching actor's responses were judged most closely to approximate voluntary choice. We found also that judgments of high volition depended upon stochastic (or probabilistic) generation. Thus, stochastic responses that match reinforcer proportions best represent voluntary human choice.ons best represent voluntary human choice. +
Neuringer 2007 +
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 88, 1-28 +
2007-Neuringer +
Stochastic matching and the voluntary nature of choice +
2007 +
Personal tools
Contents