Information for "Why Pigs Don't Have Wings"

Basic information

Display titleWhy Pigs Don't Have Wings
Default sort keyWhy Pigs Don't Have Wings
Page length (in bytes)975
Page ID1514
Page content languageen - English
Page content modelwikitext
Indexing by robotsAllowed
Number of redirects to this page0
Counted as a content pageYes
Number of subpages of this page0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects)

Page protection

EditAllow all users (infinite)
MoveAllow all users (infinite)
View the protection log for this page.

Edit history

Page creatorWikiSysop (talk | contribs)
Date of page creation13:25, 14 January 2008
Latest editorWikiSysop (talk | contribs)
Date of latest edit17:28, 25 July 2020
Total number of edits8
Total number of distinct authors1
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days)0
Recent number of distinct authors0

Page properties

Transcluded templates (2)

Templates used on this page:

... more about "Why Pigs Don't Have Wings"
According to Jerry Fodor, many evolutionarAccording to Jerry Fodor, many evolutionary biologists believe in adaptationism, the idea that (almost) everything can be explained via natural selection. He disagrees, contending that natural selection is "incoherent" and may not be the chief engine of evolution as Darwin believed: "it could turn out that there are indeed baboons in our family tree, but that natural selection isn't how they got there." He hints at a Fodor-led revolution in biology. In the November 1, 15 and 29 LRB issues a number of vexed philosophers and biologists responded and Fodor responded to them. Here is some more on the nouvelle vague in evolutionary biology... nouvelle vague in evolutionary biology... +
Fodor 2007 +
2007-Fodor +
Why Pigs Don't Have Wings +
2007 +