Difference between revisions of "Why Pigs Don't Have Wings"
(link to source, and removed unwanted CRLF) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* <section begin=ref />[[Why Pigs Don't Have Wings|Fodor 2007]]<section end=ref /> | * <section begin=ref />[[Why Pigs Don't Have Wings|Fodor 2007]]<section end=ref /> | ||
* <section begin=title />[[Why Pigs Don't Have Wings]]<section end=title /> | * <section begin=title />[[Why Pigs Don't Have Wings]]<section end=title /> | ||
* <section begin=source />''London Review of Books '' (2007), October 18<section end=source /> | * <section begin=source />''[http://www.lrb.co.uk/v29/n20/print/fodo01_.html London Review of Books]'' (2007), October 18<section end=source /> | ||
* <section begin=abstract />According to Jerry Fodor, many evolutionary biologists believe in adaptationism, the idea that (almost) everything can be explained via natural selection. He disagrees, contending that natural selection is "incoherent" and may not be the chief engine of evolution as Darwin believed: "it | * <section begin=abstract />According to Jerry Fodor, many evolutionary biologists believe in adaptationism, the idea that (almost) everything can be explained via natural selection. He disagrees, contending that natural selection is "incoherent" and may not be the chief engine of evolution as Darwin believed: "it could turn out that there are indeed baboons in our family tree, but that natural selection isn't how they got there." He hints at a Fodor-led revolution in biology. In the November 1, 15 and 29 LRB issues a number of vexed philosophers and biologists responded and Fodor responded to them. Here is some more on the nouvelle vague in evolutionary biology...<section end=abstract /> | ||
could turn out that there are indeed baboons in our family tree, but that natural selection isn't how they got there." He hints at a Fodor-led revolution in biology. In the November 1, 15 and 29 LRB issues a number of vexed philosophers and biologists responded and Fodor responded to them. Here is some more on the nouvelle vague in evolutionary biology...<section end=abstract /> | |||
* <section begin=response-qty />1<section end=response-qty /> | * <section begin=response-qty />1<section end=response-qty /> | ||
* <section begin=response-list />{{response-ref|Response:2007-Staddon.1}}<section end=response-list /> | * <section begin=response-list />{{response-ref|Response:2007-Staddon.1}}<section end=response-list /> | ||
Revision as of 13:41, 14 January 2008
- Fodor, J.
- 2007
- Fodor 2007
- Why Pigs Don't Have Wings
- London Review of Books (2007), October 18
- According to Jerry Fodor, many evolutionary biologists believe in adaptationism, the idea that (almost) everything can be explained via natural selection. He disagrees, contending that natural selection is "incoherent" and may not be the chief engine of evolution as Darwin believed: "it could turn out that there are indeed baboons in our family tree, but that natural selection isn't how they got there." He hints at a Fodor-led revolution in biology. In the November 1, 15 and 29 LRB issues a number of vexed philosophers and biologists responded and Fodor responded to them. Here is some more on the nouvelle vague in evolutionary biology...
- 1
- {{#lst:Response:2007-Staddon.1|ref}} {{#lst:Response:2007-Staddon.1|formats}}