View source for Is attention to Intention Fact or artifact

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.

You can view and copy the source of this page.

Template used on this page:

Return to Is attention to Intention Fact or artifact.

Retrieved from "https://psycrit.com/w/Is_attention_to_Intention_Fact_or_artifact"
... more about "Is attention to Intention Fact or artifact"
RDF feed
Author
André Marques-Smith +  and Armando Machado +
Author/ref
Marques-Smith +
Keyname
2008-09-01-Marques-Smith +
Lead-in
Lau et al. (2004) aimed to identify throug … Lau et al. (2004) aimed to identify through fMRI the brain region that codes for the intention to perform a motor act, and concluded that the pre-Supplementary Motor Area is where this happens. Machado and Silva’s account (2007) for these results is similar to previous attempts (Bridgeman, 1985; Gomes, 2002) to interpret Libet’s original data (Libet et al., 1983). To the extent of our knowledge, however, such accounts have never been subjected to empirical test. Our objective with this paper was to provide such a test.ith this paper was to provide such a test. +
Listing section
Attention +
Page type
Spec/response +
Responds to
2004-Lau +
Title
Attention to Intention: Fact or artifact? +
Date"Date" is a type and predefined property provided by Semantic MediaWiki to represent date values.
September 1, 2008 +