View source for Judgments of choice responding

<hide>
[[responds to::2007-Neuringer]]
[[keyname::2007-10-11-Davison]]
[[Title::Is it human? Judgments of choice responding]]
[[author::Michael Davison]]
[[author/affil::The University of Auckland, New Zealand]]
[[Date::2007-10-11]]
[[author/ref::Davison]]
[[cite/author::Davison 2007]]
[[listing section::voluntariness]]
[[lead-in::Neuringer et al. believe their experiments can tell us something about what 'voluntary behavior' is. Davison disagrees...]]
</hide>{{page/spec/response}}
==Notes==
* "snip" as posted on [[Articles]] page by JERS:
** ''Neuringer et al. believe their experiments can tell us something about what 'voluntary behavior' is.  Davison disagrees...''
* "snip" as originally posted here by Woozle (not sure where the text came from -- JERS email?):
** [[Stochastic matching and the voluntary nature of choice|Neuringer argues]] against the construct of emotion by conflating the basic-emotions perspective in neural physiology with a type of category discussed in reference philosophy...