View source for Stochastic matching and the voluntary nature of choice
You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:
You can view and copy the source of this page.
Templates used on this page:
Return to Stochastic matching and the voluntary nature of choice.
... more about "Stochastic matching and the voluntary nature of choice"
Attempts to characterize voluntary behavio … Attempts to characterize voluntary behavior have been ongoing for thousands of years. We provide experimental evidence that judgments of volition are based upon distributions of responses in relation to obtained rewards. Participants watched as responses, said to be made by "actors," appeared on a computer screen. The participant's task was to estimate how well each actor represented the voluntary choices emitted by a real person. In actuality, all actors' responses were generated by algorithms based on Baum’s (1979) generalized matching function. We systematically varied the exponent values (sensitivity parameter) of these algorithms: some actors matched response proportions to received reinforcer proportions, others overmatched (predominantly chose the highest-valued alternative), and yet others undermatched (chose relatively equally among the alternatives). In each of five experiments, we found that the matching actor's responses were judged most closely to approximate voluntary choice. We found also that judgments of high volition depended upon stochastic (or probabilistic) generation. Thus, stochastic responses that match reinforcer proportions best represent voluntary human choice.ons best represent voluntary human choice. +
Neuringer 2007 +
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 88, 1-28 +