Information for "Stochastic matching and the voluntary nature of choice"
Basic information
Display title | Stochastic matching and the voluntary nature of choice |
Default sort key | Stochastic matching and the voluntary nature of choice |
Page length (in bytes) | 1,616 |
Page ID | 1506 |
Page content language | en - English |
Page content model | wikitext |
Indexing by robots | Allowed |
Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
Counted as a content page | Yes |
Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
Page protection
Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
Edit history
Page creator | WikiSysop (talk | contribs) |
Date of page creation | 15:58, 11 October 2007 |
Latest editor | WikiSysop (talk | contribs) |
Date of latest edit | 17:26, 25 July 2020 |
Total number of edits | 7 |
Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Page properties
Transcluded templates (2) | Templates used on this page: |
... more about "Stochastic matching and the voluntary nature of choice"
Attempts to characterize voluntary behavio … Attempts to characterize voluntary behavior have been ongoing for thousands of years. We provide experimental evidence that judgments of volition are based upon distributions of responses in relation to obtained rewards. Participants watched as responses, said to be made by "actors," appeared on a computer screen. The participant's task was to estimate how well each actor represented the voluntary choices emitted by a real person. In actuality, all actors' responses were generated by algorithms based on Baum’s (1979) generalized matching function. We systematically varied the exponent values (sensitivity parameter) of these algorithms: some actors matched response proportions to received reinforcer proportions, others overmatched (predominantly chose the highest-valued alternative), and yet others undermatched (chose relatively equally among the alternatives). In each of five experiments, we found that the matching actor's responses were judged most closely to approximate voluntary choice. We found also that judgments of high volition depended upon stochastic (or probabilistic) generation. Thus, stochastic responses that match reinforcer proportions best represent voluntary human choice.ons best represent voluntary human choice. +
Neuringer 2007 +
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 88, 1-28 +