Information for "User:Jers/blog/2012/03/21/1415/What we have here is a failure to replicate!"
Basic information
Display title | User:Jers/blog/2012/03/21/1415/What we have here is a failure to replicate! |
Default sort key | Jers/blog/2012/03/21/1415/What we have here is a failure to replicate! |
Page length (in bytes) | 6,434 |
Namespace | User |
Page ID | 1602 |
Page content language | en - English |
Page content model | wikitext |
User ID | 5 |
Indexing by robots | Allowed |
Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
Page protection
Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
Edit history
Page creator | WikiSysop (talk | contribs) |
Date of page creation | 17:17, 26 April 2012 |
Latest editor | WikiSysop (talk | contribs) |
Date of latest edit | 00:28, 26 July 2020 |
Total number of edits | 8 |
Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Page properties
Transcluded template (1) | Template used on this page: |
There are thousands of published research … There are thousands of published research studies every year purporting to show a curative effect of some new drug. In a WSJ article (12/02/11) entitled “Scientists’ Elusive Goal: Reproducing Study Results”, Gautam Naik lists a slew of such ‘breakthroughs,’ reported in prestigious peer-reviewed scientific journals like Nature, Science and The Lancet, that cannot be replicated by others, particularly by pharmaceutical companies that would like to profit from them.anies that would like to profit from them. +
14:15:00, 21 March 2012 +