Information for "Why Pigs Don't Have Wings"
Basic information
| Display title | Why Pigs Don't Have Wings |
| Default sort key | Why Pigs Don't Have Wings |
| Page length (in bytes) | 975 |
| Page ID | 1514 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Counted as a content page | Yes |
| Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
Page protection
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
Edit history
| Page creator | WikiSysop (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 13:25, 14 January 2008 |
| Latest editor | WikiSysop (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 17:28, 25 July 2020 |
| Total number of edits | 8 |
| Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Page properties
| Transcluded templates (2) | Templates used on this page: |
... more about "Why Pigs Don't Have Wings"
According to Jerry Fodor, many evolutionar … According to Jerry Fodor, many evolutionary biologists believe in adaptationism, the idea that (almost) everything can be explained via natural selection. He disagrees, contending that natural selection is "incoherent" and may not be the chief engine of evolution as Darwin believed: "it could turn out that there are indeed baboons in our family tree, but that natural selection isn't how they got there." He hints at a Fodor-led revolution in biology. In the November 1, 15 and 29 LRB issues a number of vexed philosophers and biologists responded and Fodor responded to them. Here is some more on the nouvelle vague in evolutionary biology... nouvelle vague in evolutionary biology... +
Fodor 2007 +
London Review of Books (2007), October 18 +