Difference between revisions of "Why Pigs Don't Have Wings"

m (needs conversion)
(mostly converted to v3)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[category:needs conversion]]
<hide>
[[category:specs.target|Fodor 2007]]
[[category:needs tweaking]]: need list of responses; rewrite targ.show.page as module function
* <section begin=author />Fodor, J.<section end=author />
 
* <section begin=year />2007<section end=year />
[[keyname::2007-Fodor]]
* <section begin=ref />[[Why Pigs Don't Have Wings|Fodor 2007]]<section end=ref />
[[author::Fodor, J.]]
* <section begin=title />[[Why Pigs Don't Have Wings]]<section end=title />
[[year::2007]]
* <section begin=source />''[http://www.lrb.co.uk/v29/n20/print/fodo01_.html London Review of Books]'' (2007), October 18<section end=source />
[[cite/author::Fodor 2007]]
* <section begin=abstract />According to Jerry Fodor, many evolutionary biologists believe in adaptationism, the idea that (almost) everything can be explained via natural selection. He disagrees, contending that natural selection is "incoherent" and may not be the chief engine of evolution as Darwin believed: "it could turn out that there are indeed baboons in our family tree, but that natural selection isn't how they got there." He hints at a Fodor-led revolution in biology. In the November 1, 15 and 29 LRB issues a number of vexed philosophers and biologists responded and Fodor responded to them. Here is some more on the nouvelle vague in evolutionary biology...<section end=abstract />
[[title::Why Pigs Don't Have Wings]]
* <section begin=response-qty />2<section end=response-qty />
[[published in::London Review of Books]]
* <section begin=response-list />{{response-ref|Response:2007-Staddon.1}}: {{response-ref|Response:2008-Fodor-Staddon.1}}<section end=response-list />
[[cite/source::''[http://www.lrb.co.uk/v29/n20/print/fodo01_.html London Review of Books]'' (2007), October 18]]
 
<call func=smw.let.echo key=abstract>According to Jerry Fodor, many evolutionary biologists believe in adaptationism, the idea that (almost) everything can be explained via natural selection. He disagrees, contending that natural selection is "incoherent" and may not be the chief engine of evolution as Darwin believed: "it could turn out that there are indeed baboons in our family tree, but that natural selection isn't how they got there." He hints at a Fodor-led revolution in biology. In the November 1, 15 and 29 LRB issues a number of vexed philosophers and biologists responded and Fodor responded to them. Here is some more on the nouvelle vague in evolutionary biology...</call>
</hide><exec mod=psycrit func=Show_Target_Page />

Revision as of 17:52, 12 September 2012

<exec mod=psycrit func=Show_Target_Page />

Retrieved from "https://psycrit.com/w/index.php?title=Why_Pigs_Don%27t_Have_Wings&oldid=2410"
... more about "Why Pigs Don't Have Wings"
RDF feed
Author
Fodor, J. +
Cite/author
Fodor 2007 +
Cite/source
London Review of Books (2007), October 18 +
Keyname
2007-Fodor +
Published in
London Review of Books +
Title
Why Pigs Don't Have Wings +
Year
2007 +