Difference between revisions of "Is attention to Intention Fact or artifact"

m (needs conversion)
(mostly converted to v3)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[category:needs conversion]]
<hide>
<hide>
<if not flag=including hide>
[[category:needs tweaking]] - no downloads showing yet
  <echo>[[category:data/response|Marques-Smith-2008-09-01]]</echo>
 
  <echo>[[category:2004-Lau|2008-09-01-Marques-Smith]]</echo>
[[responds to::2004-Lau]]
</if>
 
<let name=target>2004-Lau</let>
[[keyname::2008-09-01-Marques-Smith]]
<let name=respTitle>Attention to Intention: Fact or artifact?</let>
[[Title::Attention to Intention: Fact or artifact?]]
<let name=respAuth>André Marques-Smith and Armando Machado</let>
[[Author::André Marques-Smith]]
<let name=respDate>2008-09-01</let>
[[Author::Armando Machado]]
<let name=respRef>Marques-Smith</let>
[[author/ref::Marques-Smith]]
<let name=respHdln>attention</let>
[[Date::2008-09-01]]
<let name=respSnip>Lau et al. (2004) aimed to identify through fMRI the brain region that codes for the intention to perform a motor act, and concluded that the pre-Supplementary Motor Area is where this happens. Machado and Silva’s account (2007) for these results is similar to previous attempts (Bridgeman, 1985; Gomes, 2002) to interpret Libet’s original data (Libet et al., 1983). To the extent of our knowledge, however, such accounts have never been subjected to empirical test. Our objective with this paper was to provide such a test.</let>
[[listing section::attention]]
</hide><noinclude>{{project:code/footer/response}}</noinclude>
 
<call smw.let.var key=lead-in>Lau et al. (2004) aimed to identify through fMRI the brain region that codes for the intention to perform a motor act, and concluded that the pre-Supplementary Motor Area is where this happens. Machado and Silva’s account (2007) for these results is similar to previous attempts (Bridgeman, 1985; Gomes, 2002) to interpret Libet’s original data (Libet et al., 1983). To the extent of our knowledge, however, such accounts have never been subjected to empirical test. Our objective with this paper was to provide such a test.</call>
</hide><exec mod=psycrit func=Show_Response_Header />

Revision as of 21:27, 12 September 2012

<exec mod=psycrit func=Show_Response_Header />

Retrieved from "https://psycrit.com/w/index.php?title=Is_attention_to_Intention_Fact_or_artifact&oldid=2445"
... more about "Is attention to Intention Fact or artifact"
RDF feed
Author
André Marques-Smith +  and Armando Machado +
Author/ref
Marques-Smith +
Keyname
2008-09-01-Marques-Smith +
Listing section
Attention +
Responds to
2004-Lau +
Title
Attention to Intention: Fact or artifact? +
Date"Date" is a type and predefined property provided by Semantic MediaWiki to represent date values.
September 1, 2008 +