Difference between revisions of "User:Jers/blog/2012/03/21/1415/What we have here is a failure to replicate!"
m (WikiSysop moved page User:Jers/blog/2012-03-21 1415 What we have here is a failure to replicate! to User:Jers/blog/2012/03/21/1415/What we have here is a failure to replicate! without leaving a redirect: standard page-naming methodology) |
m (syntax updated) |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
* '''Original''': [http://psycrit.blogspot.com/2012/03/why-studies-dont-always-repeat.html BlogSpot] via [http://sites.google.com/site/psycritorg/ PsyCrit-M] | * '''Original''': [http://psycrit.blogspot.com/2012/03/why-studies-dont-always-repeat.html BlogSpot] via [http://sites.google.com/site/psycritorg/ PsyCrit-M] | ||
</hide><noinclude><if not flag=including><call ShowBlogPostPage></if></noinclude> | </hide><noinclude><if not flag=$including><call ShowBlogPostPage></if></noinclude> | ||
Revision as of 14:49, 30 October 2012
<call ShowBlogPostPage>
There are thousands of published research … There are thousands of published research studies every year purporting to show a curative effect of some new drug. In a WSJ article (12/02/11) entitled “Scientists’ Elusive Goal: Reproducing Study Results”, Gautam Naik lists a slew of such ‘breakthroughs,’ reported in prestigious peer-reviewed scientific journals like Nature, Science and The Lancet, that cannot be replicated by others, particularly by pharmaceutical companies that would like to profit from them.anies that would like to profit from them. +
14:15:00, 21 March 2012 +