Difference between revisions of "Judgments of choice responding"

(new page from form at http://dev.psycrit.com/PsyCrit:Add_Response)
 
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<hide>
<hide>
<if flag=including></if>
[[responds to::2007-Neuringer]]
<else hide>
[[keyname::2007-10-11-Davison]]
  <echo>[[category:data/response|2007-10-11-Davison]]</echo>
[[Title::Is it human? Judgments of choice responding]]
  <echo>[[category:2007-Neuringer|Davison]]</echo>
[[author::Michael Davison]]
</else>
[[author/affil::The University of Auckland, New Zealand]]
<let name=target>2007-Neuringer</let>
[[Date::2007-10-11]]
<let name=respTitle>Is it human? Judgments of choice responding </let>
[[author/ref::Davison]]
<let name=respAuth>Michael Davison, The University of Auckland, New Zealand</let>
[[cite/author::Davison 2007]]
<let name=respDate>2007-10-11</let>
[[listing section::voluntariness]]
<let name=respRef>Davison</let>
[[lead-in::Neuringer et al. believe their experiments can tell us something about what 'voluntary behavior' is. Davison disagrees...]]
<let name=respHdln>voluntariness</let>
</hide>{{page/spec/response}}
<let name=respSnip>Neuringer et al. believe their experiments can tell us something about what 'voluntary behavior' is. Davison disagrees...</let>
</hide><noinclude>{{:project:Code/show/response}}
==Notes==
==Notes==
* "snip" as posted on [[Articles]] page by JERS:
* "snip" as posted on [[Articles]] page by JERS:
** ''Neuringer et al. believe their experiments can tell us something about what 'voluntary behavior' is.  Davison disagrees...''
** ''Neuringer et al. believe their experiments can tell us something about what 'voluntary behavior' is.  Davison disagrees...''
* "snip" as originally posted here by NS (not sure where the text came from -- JERS email?):
* "snip" as originally posted here by Woozle (not sure where the text came from -- JERS email?):
** {{#lst:Target:2007-Neuringer|ref}} argues against the construct of emotion by conflating the basic-emotions perspective in neural physiology with a type of category discussed in reference philosophy...
** [[Stochastic matching and the voluntary nature of choice|Neuringer argues]] against the construct of emotion by conflating the basic-emotions perspective in neural physiology with a type of category discussed in reference philosophy...
</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 17:02, 25 July 2020


no responses found

Notes

  • "snip" as posted on Articles page by JERS:
    • Neuringer et al. believe their experiments can tell us something about what 'voluntary behavior' is. Davison disagrees...
  • "snip" as originally posted here by Woozle (not sure where the text came from -- JERS email?):
    • Neuringer argues against the construct of emotion by conflating the basic-emotions perspective in neural physiology with a type of category discussed in reference philosophy...
Retrieved from "https://psycrit.com/w/index.php?title=Judgments_of_choice_responding&oldid=2703"
... more about "Judgments of choice responding"
RDF feed
Author
Michael Davison +
Author/affil
The University of Auckland, New Zealand +
Author/ref
Davison +
Cite/author
Davison 2007 +
Keyname
2007-10-11-Davison +
Lead-in
Neuringer et al. believe their experiments can tell us something about what 'voluntary behavior' is. Davison disagrees... +
Listing section
Voluntariness +
Page type
Spec/response +
Responds to
2007-Neuringer +
Title
Is it human? Judgments of choice responding +
Date"Date" is a type and predefined property provided by Semantic MediaWiki to represent date values.
October 11, 2007 +