Difference between revisions of "Addiction and cue-triggered decision processes"

m (using new footer template)
 
(14 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<hide>
<hide>
<let name=keyname>2004-Bernheim</let>
[[keyname::2004-Bernheim]]
<let name=author>Bernheim, D. R., & Rangel, A.</let>
[[author::Bernheim, D. R.]]
<let name=year>2004</let>
[[author::Rangel, A.]]
<let name=ref>Bernheim 2004</let>
[[year::2004]]
<let name=title>Addiction and cue-triggered decision processes</let>
[[cite/author::Bernheim 2004]]
<let name=source>''American Economic Review'', 1558-1590. December</let>
[[title::Addiction and cue-triggered decision processes]]
<let name=abstract>We propose a model of addiction based on three premises: (i) use among addicts is frequently a mistake; (ii) experience sensitizes an individual to environmental cues that trigger mistaken usage; (iii) addicts understand and manage their susceptibilities. We argue that these premises find support in evidence from psychology, neuroscience, and clinical practice. The model is tractable and generates a plausible mapping between behavior and the characteristics of the user, substance, and environment. It accounts for a number of important patterns associated with addiction, gives rise to a clear welfare standard, and has novel implications for policy.</let>


<let name=target copy=keyname />
[[published in::Perspectives on Psychological Science]]
</hide>{{project:code/footer/target}}
[[cite/source::''Perspectives on Psychological Science'', 1, 28-58]]
[[published in::American Economic Review]]
[[cite/source::''American Economic Review'', 1558-1590. December]]
 
[[abstract::We propose a model of addiction based on three premises: (i) use among addicts is frequently a mistake; (ii) experience sensitizes an individual to environmental cues that trigger mistaken usage; (iii) addicts understand and manage their susceptibilities. We argue that these premises find support in evidence from psychology, neuroscience, and clinical practice. The model is tractable and generates a plausible mapping between behavior and the characteristics of the user, substance, and environment. It accounts for a number of important patterns associated with addiction, gives rise to a clear welfare standard, and has novel implications for policy.]]
 
</hide>{{Page/spec/target}}

Latest revision as of 14:04, 26 July 2020


Addiction and cue-triggered decision processes: Bernheim, D. R., Rangel, A. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 28-58, American Economic Review, 1558-1590. December (2004).

Abstract

We propose a model of addiction based on three premises: (i) use among addicts is frequently a mistake; (ii) experience sensitizes an individual to environmental cues that trigger mistaken usage; (iii) addicts understand and manage their susceptibilities. We argue that these premises find support in evidence from psychology, neuroscience, and clinical practice. The model is tractable and generates a plausible mapping between behavior and the characteristics of the user, substance, and environment. It accounts for a number of important patterns associated with addiction, gives rise to a clear welfare standard, and has novel implications for policy.

Responses

 Date"Date" is a type and predefined property provided by Semantic MediaWiki to represent date values.AuthorLead-in
Will you take 'neuro' with that?16 July 2006J. E. R. StaddonNeuroeconomics is an interesting idea that has an epistemological worm at its core... but there is no guarantee at all that the optimizing process corresponds to "explicit optimization" in which courses of action are well-defined...
Retrieved from "https://psycrit.com/w/index.php?title=Addiction_and_cue-triggered_decision_processes&oldid=2735"
... more about "Addiction and cue-triggered decision processes"
RDF feed
Abstract
We propose a model of addiction based on t … We propose a model of addiction based on three premises: (i) use among addicts is frequently a mistake; (ii) experience sensitizes an individual to environmental cues that trigger mistaken usage; (iii) addicts understand and manage their susceptibilities. We argue that these premises find support in evidence from psychology, neuroscience, and clinical practice. The model is tractable and generates a plausible mapping between behavior and the characteristics of the user, substance, and environment. It accounts for a number of important patterns associated with addiction, gives rise to a clear welfare standard, and has novel implications for policy.rd, and has novel implications for policy. +
Author
Bernheim, D. R. +  and Rangel, A. +
Cite/author
Bernheim 2004 +
Cite/source
Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 28-58 +  and American Economic Review, 1558-1590. December +
Format version
3.1 +
Keyname
2004-Bernheim +
Page type
Spec/target +
Published in
Perspectives on Psychological Science +  and American Economic Review +
Title
Addiction and cue-triggered decision processes +
Year
2004 +