Difference between revisions of "Addiction and cue-triggered decision processes"

(partial conversion; needs coding work)
 
(13 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<hide>
<hide>
[[page type::specs]]
[[keyname::2004-Bernheim]]
[[specs type::target]]
[[author::Bernheim, D. R.]]
[[format version::3]]
[[author::Rangel, A.]]
[[year::2004]]
[[cite/author::Bernheim 2004]]
[[title::Addiction and cue-triggered decision processes]]


<call smw.let.var key=keyname>2004-Bernheim</call>
[[published in::Perspectives on Psychological Science]]
<call smw.let.var key=author>Bernheim, D. R.</call>
[[cite/source::''Perspectives on Psychological Science'', 1, 28-58]]
<call smw.let.var key=author>Rangel, A.</call>
[[published in::American Economic Review]]
<call smw.let.var key=year>2004</call>
[[cite/source::''American Economic Review'', 1558-1590. December]]
<call smw.let.var key=author/ref>Bernheim 2004</call>
<call smw.let.var key=title>Addiction and cue-triggered decision processes</call>
<call smw.let.var key=source>''American Economic Review'', 1558-1590. December</call>
<call smw.let.var key=abstract>We propose a model of addiction based on three premises: (i) use among addicts is frequently a mistake; (ii) experience sensitizes an individual to environmental cues that trigger mistaken usage; (iii) addicts understand and manage their susceptibilities. We argue that these premises find support in evidence from psychology, neuroscience, and clinical practice. The model is tractable and generates a plausible mapping between behavior and the characteristics of the user, substance, and environment. It accounts for a number of important patterns associated with addiction, gives rise to a clear welfare standard, and has novel implications for policy.</call>


<let name=target copy=keyname />
[[abstract::We propose a model of addiction based on three premises: (i) use among addicts is frequently a mistake; (ii) experience sensitizes an individual to environmental cues that trigger mistaken usage; (iii) addicts understand and manage their susceptibilities. We argue that these premises find support in evidence from psychology, neuroscience, and clinical practice. The model is tractable and generates a plausible mapping between behavior and the characteristics of the user, substance, and environment. It accounts for a number of important patterns associated with addiction, gives rise to a clear welfare standard, and has novel implications for policy.]]
</hide><call targ.show.specs />
 
</hide>{{Page/spec/target}}

Latest revision as of 14:04, 26 July 2020


Addiction and cue-triggered decision processes: Bernheim, D. R., Rangel, A. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 28-58, American Economic Review, 1558-1590. December (2004).

Abstract

We propose a model of addiction based on three premises: (i) use among addicts is frequently a mistake; (ii) experience sensitizes an individual to environmental cues that trigger mistaken usage; (iii) addicts understand and manage their susceptibilities. We argue that these premises find support in evidence from psychology, neuroscience, and clinical practice. The model is tractable and generates a plausible mapping between behavior and the characteristics of the user, substance, and environment. It accounts for a number of important patterns associated with addiction, gives rise to a clear welfare standard, and has novel implications for policy.

Responses

 Date"Date" is a type and predefined property provided by Semantic MediaWiki to represent date values.AuthorLead-in
Will you take 'neuro' with that?16 July 2006J. E. R. StaddonNeuroeconomics is an interesting idea that has an epistemological worm at its core... but there is no guarantee at all that the optimizing process corresponds to "explicit optimization" in which courses of action are well-defined...
Retrieved from "https://psycrit.com/w/index.php?title=Addiction_and_cue-triggered_decision_processes&oldid=2735"
... more about "Addiction and cue-triggered decision processes"
RDF feed
Abstract
We propose a model of addiction based on t … We propose a model of addiction based on three premises: (i) use among addicts is frequently a mistake; (ii) experience sensitizes an individual to environmental cues that trigger mistaken usage; (iii) addicts understand and manage their susceptibilities. We argue that these premises find support in evidence from psychology, neuroscience, and clinical practice. The model is tractable and generates a plausible mapping between behavior and the characteristics of the user, substance, and environment. It accounts for a number of important patterns associated with addiction, gives rise to a clear welfare standard, and has novel implications for policy.rd, and has novel implications for policy. +
Author
Bernheim, D. R. +  and Rangel, A. +
Cite/author
Bernheim 2004 +
Cite/source
Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 28-58 +  and American Economic Review, 1558-1590. December +
Format version
3.1 +
Keyname
2004-Bernheim +
Page type
Spec/target +
Published in
Perspectives on Psychological Science +  and American Economic Review +
Title
Addiction and cue-triggered decision processes +
Year
2004 +