Difference between revisions of "Addiction and cue-triggered decision processes"
m (another note) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<hide> | <hide> | ||
[[keyname::2004-Bernheim]] | [[keyname::2004-Bernheim]] | ||
[[author::Bernheim, D. R.]] | [[author::Bernheim, D. R.]] | ||
| Line 8: | Line 6: | ||
[[cite/author::Bernheim 2004]] | [[cite/author::Bernheim 2004]] | ||
[[title::Addiction and cue-triggered decision processes]] | [[title::Addiction and cue-triggered decision processes]] | ||
[[published in::Perspectives on Psychological Science]] | |||
[[cite/source::''Perspectives on Psychological Science'', 1, 28-58]] | |||
[[published in::American Economic Review]] | [[published in::American Economic Review]] | ||
[[cite/source::''American Economic Review'', 1558-1590. December]] | [[cite/source::''American Economic Review'', 1558-1590. December]] | ||
[[abstract::We propose a model of addiction based on three premises: (i) use among addicts is frequently a mistake; (ii) experience sensitizes an individual to environmental cues that trigger mistaken usage; (iii) addicts understand and manage their susceptibilities. We argue that these premises find support in evidence from psychology, neuroscience, and clinical practice. The model is tractable and generates a plausible mapping between behavior and the characteristics of the user, substance, and environment. It accounts for a number of important patterns associated with addiction, gives rise to a clear welfare standard, and has novel implications for policy.]] | |||
< | </hide>{{Page/spec/target}} | ||
Latest revision as of 14:04, 26 July 2020
Addiction and cue-triggered decision processes: Bernheim, D. R., Rangel, A. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 28-58, American Economic Review, 1558-1590. December (2004).
Abstract
We propose a model of addiction based on three premises: (i) use among addicts is frequently a mistake; (ii) experience sensitizes an individual to environmental cues that trigger mistaken usage; (iii) addicts understand and manage their susceptibilities. We argue that these premises find support in evidence from psychology, neuroscience, and clinical practice. The model is tractable and generates a plausible mapping between behavior and the characteristics of the user, substance, and environment. It accounts for a number of important patterns associated with addiction, gives rise to a clear welfare standard, and has novel implications for policy.
Responses
| Date"Date" is a type and predefined property provided by Semantic MediaWiki to represent date values. | Author | Lead-in | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Will you take 'neuro' with that? | 16 July 2006 | J. E. R. Staddon | Neuroeconomics is an interesting idea that has an epistemological worm at its core... but there is no guarantee at all that the optimizing process corresponds to "explicit optimization" in which courses of action are well-defined... |
... more about "Addiction and cue-triggered decision processes"
We propose a model of addiction based on t … We propose a model of addiction based on three premises: (i) use among addicts is frequently a mistake; (ii) experience sensitizes an individual to environmental cues that trigger mistaken usage; (iii) addicts understand and manage their susceptibilities. We argue that these premises find support in evidence from psychology, neuroscience, and clinical practice. The model is tractable and generates a plausible mapping between behavior and the characteristics of the user, substance, and environment. It accounts for a number of important patterns associated with addiction, gives rise to a clear welfare standard, and has novel implications for policy.rd, and has novel implications for policy. +
Bernheim 2004 +