Difference between revisions of "A dialogue between Fodor and Staddon"
(full PDF link) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
[[lead-in::Jerry Fodor responded to John Staddon’s comment, and a dialogue ensued. The focal point seems to be whether natural selection should (Fodor), or potentially does (Staddon) provide a causal account of evolutionary adaptation.]] | [[lead-in::Jerry Fodor responded to John Staddon’s comment, and a dialogue ensued. The focal point seems to be whether natural selection should (Fodor), or potentially does (Staddon) provide a causal account of evolutionary adaptation.]] | ||
</hide>{{page/spec/response}} | </hide>{{page/spec/response}} | ||
==Full Text== | |||
(showing 1st page; [[media:FodorStaddon2008.pdf|full PDF]])[[File:FodorStaddon2008.pdf]] |
Latest revision as of 18:41, 8 August 2020
- Title: Response: A dialogue between Fodor and Staddon
- Author(s): J. E. R. Staddon, Jerry Fodor
- Date: 12 February 2008
- Keyname: 2008-02-12-Fodor
- Responds to: Paley Redivivus
- Lead-in: Jerry Fodor responded to John Staddon’s comment, and a dialogue ensued. The focal point seems to be whether natural selection should (Fodor), or potentially does (Staddon) provide a causal account of evolutionary adaptation.
no responses found
Full Text
(showing 1st page; full PDF)
... more about "A dialogue between Fodor and Staddon"
Jerry Fodor responded to John Staddon’s comment, and a dialogue ensued. The focal point seems to be whether natural selection should (Fodor), or potentially does (Staddon) provide a causal account of evolutionary adaptation. +
Date"Date" is a type and predefined property provided by Semantic MediaWiki to represent date values.
February 12, 2008 +