Difference between revisions of "Articles"
(→Commentaries and Reports: target & commentary: emotion) |
(→Commentaries and Reports: 2006-10-27 submission: summary) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| valign=top width=50% | | | valign=top width=50% | | ||
===SOCIAL SCIENCE=== | |||
{{faint|2006-10-27}} '''Ill-defined'''. What is happening to political science when leading thinkers can pretend to advance knowledge by little more than re-defining words? | |||
In their article ''[[Anti-Americanisms]]'', an abstract of a forthcoming book, Katzenstein and Keohane begin thus... {{:Formats:Bertrand 2006-10-27}} | |||
===EMOTION=== | ===EMOTION=== | ||
{{faint|2006-09-23}} '''Emotion is Natural but Categories are Not'''. [[Are Emotions Natural Kinds?|Barrett (2006)]] argues against the construct of emotion by conflating the basic-emotions perspective in neural physiology with a type of category discussed in reference philosophy... {{:Formats:Alvarado 2006-09-23}} | {{faint|2006-09-23}} '''Emotion is Natural but Categories are Not'''. [[Are Emotions Natural Kinds?|Barrett (2006)]] argues against the construct of emotion by conflating the basic-emotions perspective in neural physiology with a type of category discussed in reference philosophy... {{:Formats:Alvarado 2006-09-23}} |
Revision as of 16:36, 27 October 2006
Target Articles |
Commentaries and Reports
|