Difference between revisions of "Articles"
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
===SOCIAL SCIENCE=== | ===SOCIAL SCIENCE=== | ||
{{faint|2006-10-27}} '''Ill-defined'''. ''What is happening to political science when leading thinkers can pretend to advance knowledge by little more than re-defining words? In their article ''[[Anti-Americanisms]]'', an abstract of a forthcoming book, Katzenstein and Keohane begin thus...'' Bertrand: {{:Formats:Bertrand 2006-10-27}} | {{faint|2006-10-27}} '''Ill-defined'''. ''What is happening to political science when leading thinkers can pretend to advance knowledge by little more than re-defining words? In their article ''[[Anti-Americanisms]]'', an abstract of a forthcoming book, Katzenstein and Keohane begin thus...'' Bertrand: {{:Formats:Bertrand/Keohane 2006-10-27}} | ||
===EMOTION=== | ===EMOTION=== | ||
{{faint|2006-09-23}} '''Emotion is Natural but Categories are Not'''. ''[[Are Emotions Natural Kinds?|Barrett (2006)]] argues against the construct of emotion by conflating the basic-emotions perspective in neural physiology with a type of category discussed in reference philosophy...'' Alvarado/Barrett: {{:Formats:Alvarado 2006-09-23}} | {{faint|2006-09-23}} '''Emotion is Natural but Categories are Not'''. ''[[Are Emotions Natural Kinds?|Barrett (2006)]] argues against the construct of emotion by conflating the basic-emotions perspective in neural physiology with a type of category discussed in reference philosophy...'' Alvarado/Barrett: {{:Formats:Alvarado 2006-09-23}} |
Revision as of 13:04, 15 March 2007
Target Articles |
Commentaries and Reports
|