Difference between revisions of "A dialogue between Fodor and Staddon"

Revision as of 13:26, 25 July 2020

Title: Response: A dialogue between Fodor and Staddon
Author(s): J. E. R. Staddon, Jerry Fodor
Date: 12 February 2008
Keyname: 2008-02-12-Fodor
Responds to: Paley Redivivus
Lead-in: Jerry Fodor responded to John Staddon’s comment, and a dialogue ensued. The focal point seems to be whether natural selection should (Fodor), or potentially does (Staddon) provide a causal account of evolutionary adaptation.

no responses found

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 <hide>
-[[category:needs tweaking]] - no downloads showing yet
 [[responds to::2007-12-28-Staddon]]
 [[keyname::2008-02-12-Fodor]]
@@ Line 11: / Line 9: @@
 [[listing section::evolution]]
-<call smw.let.var key=lead-in>Jerry Fodor responded to John Staddon’s comment, and a dialogue ensued. The focal point seems to be whether natural selection should (Fodor), or potentially does (Staddon) provide a causal account of evolutionary adaptation.</call>
+[[lead-in::Jerry Fodor responded to John Staddon’s comment, and a dialogue ensued. The focal point seems to be whether natural selection should (Fodor), or potentially does (Staddon) provide a causal account of evolutionary adaptation.]]
-</hide><exec mod=psycrit func=Show_Response_Header />
+[[full text::File:FodorStaddon2008.pdf]]
+</hide>{{page/spec/response}}