Information for "Is attention to Intention Fact or artifact"

From PsyCrit
Jump to: navigation, search

Basic information

Display titleIs attention to Intention Fact or artifact
Default sort keyIs attention to Intention Fact or artifact
Page length (in bytes)914
Page ID1573
Page content languageen - English
Page content modelwikitext
Indexing by robotsAllowed
Number of redirects to this page0
Counted as a content pageYes
Number of subpages of this page0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects)

Page protection

EditAllow all users (infinite)
MoveAllow all users (infinite)
View the protection log for this page.

Edit history

Page creatorWikiSysop (talk | contribs)
Date of page creation11:26, 24 September 2008
Latest editorWikiSysop (talk | contribs)
Date of latest edit14:15, 25 July 2020
Total number of edits9
Total number of distinct authors1
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days)0
Recent number of distinct authors0

Page properties

Transcluded template (1)

Template used on this page:

2008-09-01-Marques-Smith +
Lau et al. (2004) aimed to identify througLau et al. (2004) aimed to identify through fMRI the brain region that codes for the intention to perform a motor act, and concluded that the pre-Supplementary Motor Area is where this happens. Machado and Silva’s account (2007) for these results is similar to previous attempts (Bridgeman, 1985; Gomes, 2002) to interpret Libet’s original data (Libet et al., 1983). To the extent of our knowledge, however, such accounts have never been subjected to empirical test. Our objective with this paper was to provide such a test.ith this paper was to provide such a test. +
Attention to Intention: Fact or artifact? +
Date"Date" is a type and predefined property provided by Semantic MediaWiki to represent date values.
September 1, 2008 +
Personal tools
Contents