Information for "User:Jers/blog/2012/03/21/1415/What we have here is a failure to replicate!"

Basic information

Display titleUser:Jers/blog/2012/03/21/1415/What we have here is a failure to replicate!
Default sort keyJers/blog/2012/03/21/1415/What we have here is a failure to replicate!
Page length (in bytes)6,434
NamespaceUser
Page ID1602
Page content languageen - English
Page content modelwikitext
User ID5
Indexing by robotsAllowed
Number of redirects to this page0
Number of subpages of this page0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects)

Page protection

EditAllow all users (infinite)
MoveAllow all users (infinite)
View the protection log for this page.

Edit history

Page creatorWikiSysop (talk | contribs)
Date of page creation17:17, 26 April 2012
Latest editorWikiSysop (talk | contribs)
Date of latest edit00:28, 26 July 2020
Total number of edits8
Total number of distinct authors1
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days)0
Recent number of distinct authors0

Page properties

Transcluded template (1)

Template used on this page:

There are thousands of published research There are thousands of published research studies every year purporting to show a curative effect of some new drug. In a WSJ article (12/02/11) entitled “Scientists’ Elusive Goal: Reproducing Study Results”, Gautam Naik lists a slew of such ‘breakthroughs,’ reported in prestigious peer-reviewed scientific journals like Nature, Science and The Lancet, that cannot be replicated by others, particularly by pharmaceutical companies that would like to profit from them.anies that would like to profit from them. +
What we have here is a failure to replicate! +
14:15:00, 21 March 2012 +