Difference between revisions of "User:Jers/blog/2012/03/21/1415/What we have here is a failure to replicate!"
m (WikiSysop moved page User:WikiSysop/blog/2012-04-26 1315 What we have here is a failure to replicate! to User:Jers/blog/2012-03-21 1415 What we have here is a failure to replicate! without leaving a redirect: corrected user and timestamp) |
m (corrected user datum) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<hide> | <hide> | ||
<let name=data index=Title>What we have here is a failure to replicate!</let> | <let name=data index=Title>What we have here is a failure to replicate!</let> | ||
<let name=data index=User> | <let name=data index=User>Jers</let> | ||
<let name=data index=TopicsUser></let> | <let name=data index=TopicsUser></let> | ||
<let name=data index=TopicsGlobal>\scientific publication\reproducibility</let> | <let name=data index=TopicsGlobal>\scientific publication\reproducibility</let> | ||
Revision as of 22:33, 26 April 2012
There are thousands of published research … There are thousands of published research studies every year purporting to show a curative effect of some new drug. In a WSJ article (12/02/11) entitled “Scientists’ Elusive Goal: Reproducing Study Results”, Gautam Naik lists a slew of such ‘breakthroughs,’ reported in prestigious peer-reviewed scientific journals like Nature, Science and The Lancet, that cannot be replicated by others, particularly by pharmaceutical companies that would like to profit from them.anies that would like to profit from them. +
14:15:00, 21 March 2012 +