Difference between revisions of "User:Jers/blog/2012/05/06/1539/Welfare and the Mises Dilemma"
(links and the rest of the formatting (I think)) |
(v2.1) |
||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
<let name=data index=TimeStamp>2012-05-06 1539</let> | <let name=data index=TimeStamp>2012-05-06 1539</let> | ||
</hide><noinclude | </hide><noinclude><call ShowBlogPostPage /></noinclude> | ||
Revision as of 23:58, 8 August 2012
<call ShowBlogPostPage />
... more about "Jers/blog/2012/05/06/1539/Welfare and the Mises Dilemma"
It is usually thought good for someone who … It is usually thought good for someone who has more than enough to help someone who has less. It is not so obvious that it’s good for one person to take from a second to give to a third who may be in need. Yet that is what government welfare entails: forced taking from one group of people to give to another group. Welfare like this may serve a larger social end, but it rests on uncertain moral ground. I believe that it is also likely to fail on practical grounds. Welfare is another example of what I have called elsewhere the malign hand.</br></br>Welfare has two effects:he malign hand].
Welfare has two effects: +
15:39:00, 6 May 2012 +